West Bengal
Thiknikata and Porajhar villages
,
Kawakhali
,
Darjeeling
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
February 16, 2026
Land, consent, and delay: Contested land return and township development in Kawakhali, West Bengal
Reported by
Mitali Biswas
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
52
People affected
2005
Year started
4.63
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
52
People Affected
2005
Year started
4.63
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Unclassifed
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

On the outskirts of Siliguri, where a proposed township was to come up, 52 landowners from Kawakhali village are demanding their land back from the Siliguri Jalpaiguri Development Authority (SJDA), a subsidiary organisation under the West Bengal government.

In 2005, the SJDA had acquired 302 acres of land in Thiknikata, Kawakhali and Porajhar villages. At the time of the acquisition, 52 of 1,700 landowners had refused to give away their land, but their land was forcefully acquired. The dissenting landowners, farmers by occupation, declined the compensation offered and organised protests to mobilise support to win back their land. According to them, the authorities used misleading tactics and took away their land by terming it fallow.

On 27 November 2017, the Press Trust of India reported that the state had decided to return the land back to all 52 land owners. 

On 16 May 2019, LCW contacted the SJDA via telephone for an update and was directed to the executive engineer, who said that the process of returning the land had started but got delayed. When asked about the number of people who had received their land so far, they were unable to provide a clear number. 

In 2021, members of the Porajhar Kawakhali Bhumi Raksha Committee (PKBRC) renewed their demand for the state government to return their plots of land that had been acquired before. The then Urban Development and Municipal Affairs Minister Chandrima Bhattacharya gave a verbal statement proposing alternate land plots be provided to the landowners if they withdraw their High Court case. A representative of PKBRC demanded this proposal in writing with details of the process.

As of March 2024, a township 'Utsadhara' has come up in Kawakhali where the government of West Bengal has handed over land rights and dwelling units to more than 1,000 people, out of which 422 persons have received dwelling units. Reportedly, land rights were given to 500 tea garden workers and land pattas to 102 persons from refugee colonies.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to get back acquired land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to get back their acquired land

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

9

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2005

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

November, 2017

Why did the conflict end?

In November 2017, the West Bengal government decided to return the land back to all 52 land owners. In May 2019, LCW contacted the Siliguri Jalpaiguri Development Authority via telephone for an update and was directed to the executive engineer, who said that the process of returning the land had got delayed but had started.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Left goverment, Siliguri Jalpaiguri Development Authority (SJDA)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Siliguri Jalpaiguri Development Authority (SJDA)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Mitali Biswas

Mitali has previously worked as a freelance journalist for Doordarshan. She has directed and produced documentaries themed on sexual violence against women and the peasant movement at Bhangar in West Bengal. She has also co-directed SD, an investigative biography on slain Naxalite leader Saroj Datta. She is currently in the editorial board of Protibidhan, a Bengali magazine dedicated to women’s movements.

Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to get back acquired land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us