Farmers in Karnataka's Tumkur Demand Water in Exchange for Land for Yettinahole Project

Reported by

Tamanna NaseerLand Conflict Watch

Last updated on

October 7, 2021

Location of Conflict

Tiptur tehsil

Edenahalli, Halepalya, Kanchaghatta, Bommalapura, Madihalli, Geddalihalli villages


Reason or Cause of Conflict

Water Management

Construction of pipelines and canals to divert river water



People Affected by Conflict


Land Area Affected (in Hectares)



Starting Year





Seven droughtstricken villages in Tumkur districts Tiptur tehsil have protested against the acquisition of land for the Yettinahole Integrated Drinking Water Project as government officials and politicians have not accepted their demand of receiving 1.5 TMC (thousand million cubic feet) water from the project in exchange for their land and have neither clarified the amount of compensation that they will receive for the same. The project is currently in the survey stage in Tiptur, but farmers are already boycotting such procedures. Land is proposed to be acquired from Bommalapura, Madihalli, Geddalahalli, Edenahalli, Halepalya and Kanchaghatta villages in Tiptur, which is grappling with depleting groundwater levels, but the farmers from these villages will be unable to access any water from the project. Yettinahole is a tributary of the Netravati river in Dakshin Kannada district. The government plans to divert 24 TMC, or 672 billion litres, of the river water to provide drinking water to the droughtprone districts of Kolar, Bengaluru Rural, Chikkaballapura, Hassan and Tumkur through pipeline and canals. If executed, the project will submerge many villages, affecting farmlands and displacing families. Even fisherfolk are expected to be affected due to the reduced water flow in catchment areas of the stream. According to activists, the 91 families in Tiptur from whom land will be acquired fear that they may not be compensated** **as per the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (LARR) Act, 2013, because government officials have not yet announced the compensation amount. They have demanded that the government lay out the details of the compensation before they proceed with the survey. They have also accused the government of trying to rush through the work without discussing the rehabilitation and resettlement processes. They told LCW that there is an attempt to lure villagers by paying a small amount and getting tripartite agreements signed among three parties farmers, contractors doing the civil work and Special Land Acquisition Officer. On May 24, 2019, the National Green Tribunal gave the green signal to the project. The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change also approved the project following a spot inspection carried out in December 2015. Local organisations, such as Yettinahole Horata Samiti, have held several meetings with the affected farmers in Tiptur and tried to educate them about the land acquisition law. The Samiti, along with the Yettinahole Protection Committee and others, have also organised several demonstrations in Tiptur and blocked roads as a form of protest. On June 10, 2019, activists were detained for a few hours for protesting along with some 1,000 farmers in front of the Tiptur Municipal Council office.   On December 24, the Yettinahole Horata Samiti submitted a memorandum to the Tiptur Assistant Commissioner underlining their demands, which included fixing of compensation amount before the start of work, adequate compensation to land owners under the LARR Act and cancellation of surveys done in the absence of land owners. The project had received the Cabinet's approval in 2012 and reports suggest that it is likely to miss the June 2020 deadline of completion of the first phase by at least a year due to delays in land acquisition. 

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1.5 TMC (thousand million cubic feet) water for Tiptur tehsil

Region Classification


Type of Land


Type of Common Land

Total investment involved (in Crores):


Type of investment:

Revised Investment

Year of Estimation

Has the Conflict Ended?


When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws, Other

Legislations/Policies Involved

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

APPLICATION No. 303 of 2014 (SZ)

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:


Whether criminal law was used against protestors

Official name of the criminal law. Did the case reach trial?

Reported Details of the Violation:

Activists were detained for a few hours for protesting along with some 1,000 farmers.

Date of Violation

June 10, 2019

Location of Violation

Tiptur City Municipal Council Office

Nature of Protest

Complaints, petitions, memorandums to officials , Blockades

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

On being asked why villagers are protesting against land acquisition for the Yettinahole project in Tiptur tehsil, G.D. Shekar, Yettinahole Special Land Acquisition Officer, Tumkur, told LCW over phone: "Out of 33 villages in Tiptur, only seven villages are not allowing officials to conduct survey, primarily because land is being acquired from these villages for two other projects as well -- a bypass road project and national highway project -- besides Yettinahole. The villagers have asked for drinking water and fair compensation. Although the local people are good and might get convinced to give up their land, realtors are provoking them." On whether the government is offering them adequate compensation, Shekar said, "The land acquisition process is at a very nascent stage here. We are only conducting surveys at this stage; discussions will take place over the compensation amount later, and the villagers will be given time to file their complaints."

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of Corporate Authorities Approached

Other Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
No Images Available

Documented By

Tamanna Naseer

Reviewed By

Tamanna Naseer

Updated By

Tamanna Naseer

Edited By

Tamanna NaseerLand Conflict Watch

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now