Fishing in Lake Objected by Brahmins in Sabarkantha Leading to Suspension of Fishing License

Reported by

Aditi PatilLand Conflict Watch

Last updated on

January 6, 2020

Location of Conflict



This is A Schedule Five District

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Caste-Based Conflict



People Affected by Conflict


Land Area Affected (in Hectares)


Starting Year





Land Use

The collector of Sabarkantha district in Gujarat has suspended fishing licenses of fisherfolk in Pratapsagar lake following objections raised by regional Brahmin community a "high" social caste in India that fishing in the lake hurts their religious feelings. A petition was moved by Asha Matsya Vikas Khedut Mangalam Mandal, fisherfolk cooperative, on 29th August 2018 against this suspension. According to the petition, the Government had issued an advertisement for tender for fishing contract in June 2017. The associations tender was accepted and on October 24, 2017, the contract was awarded for fishing in Pratapsagar reservoir for five years with retrospective effect from July 2017 to June 2022. One Hiralal Punamlal Joshi from the district had filed a PIL in the High Court, challenging the tender on the ground that fishing in the Pratapsagar lake amounted to hurting religious feelings, as the Brahmins were vegetarian and they didn't approve the killing of fish. However, he later withdrew it. Despite the withdrawal of this PIL the district authorities have not revoked the suspension of the fishing license. The Gujarat High Court had sought the Governments reply by September 9, 2018 but there are no updates on the Government's reply.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Type of Land

Type of Common Land

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community? What was the decision of the concerned government department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Legal Status:

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Whether criminal law was used against protestors

Official name of the criminal law. Did the case reach trial?

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Administrator, Sabarkantha.

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of Corporate Authorities Approached

Other Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
No Images Available

Documented By

Aditi Patil

Reviewed By

Aditi Patil

Updated By

Aditi Patil

Edited By

Aditi PatilLand Conflict Watch

Support our work

Your contribution ensures continuity of this crucial project.

As a member, you will get exclusive access to special reports, policy papers and research projects undertaken by Land Conflict Watch and behind-the-scenes interactions with the writers and researchers about their work.
Contribute Now