JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Mising Tribe in Assam's Laika-Dodhia Villages Awaiting Rehabilitation for Over 70 Years

Reported by

East Street Journal Asia

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

East Street Journal Asia

Published on

May 6, 2024

Edited on

April 25, 2024

State

Assam

Sector

Conservation and Forestry

People Affected by Conflict

12000

Households Affected by Conflict

1480

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

373

ha

Starting Year

1950

Location of Conflict

Laika and Dodhia Villages

Laika is located in Tinsukia and Dodhia is located in Dibrugarh district

Tinsukia

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Protected Areas

Protected area management

National Park

Land Conflict Summary

In the aftermath of the 1950 earthquake in Assam, thousands of families from the Mising tribe, living along the banks of the Brahmaputra, were displaced. The government of Assam established the Laika and Dodhia forest villages in Dibru and Saikhowa forests, respectively, between 1951 to 1957 to settle the Mising community. The Dibru and Saikhowa forest reserves were merged to form the Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary in 1986, and later_ _notified as a national park in 1999.

The rehabilitation of the residents of Laika-Dodhia villages has remained a contentious issue since. Successive state_ _governments have failed to rehabilitate the displaced families as they could not find suitable land. The affected families have been displaced multiple times due to recurrent floods and erosion.

The Takam Mising Porin Kebang (TMPK) alleges that Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary was upgraded to a national park without consulting the forest dwellers living in the area.

According to a news report, the Mising families lack basic facilities, such as electricity and water supply, and have been denied access to government welfare schemes since 1986 even as a government notification mandated that the residents be permitted to reside in the forest area till they are shifted elsewhere.

In 2012, the Mising community was again displaced by floods from Laika-Dodhia. The community moved to Namphai forest reserve but were evicted by the forest department. In the years that followed, the Mising community has faced several evictions and harassment at the hands of forest officials. In 2013, the authorities burnt down newly built huts of the Mising families who had settled in Namphai, calling them ‘encroachers’.

Following another major flood in 2017, the Misings entered Tarani forest reserve. On July 21, 2017, a meeting was chaired by the deputy commissioner in Tinsukia with the district administration, forest department and TMPK representatives. It was decided that the state government “will take all necessary steps for the rehabilitation of the legal inhabitants of Dodhia forest village in Dibru Saikhowa National Park” within eight months.

On October 20, 2020, in a letter addressed to the Tinsukia Wildlife Division for the relocation of Laika and Dodhia residents, 373 hectares of land were proposed to be allocated in Owguri area of Upper Dehing Reserve Forest division. But during a detailed survey, it was found that rehabilitation would involve the felling of 8,000-10,000 trees. A committee constituted by the Tinsukia deputy commissioner had also objected to the rehabilitation of all people into a single area in Owguri.

About 3,000 Mising residents of Laika-Dodhia have been staging a protest since December 2020 at a makeshift site near the deputy commissioner’s office, which went on for more than 43 days. Three protesters, including a 24-year-old pregnant woman and another 50-year-old woman, died due to cold and lack of health facilities at the makeshift camp.

On December 29, 2020, Congress leader Debabrata Saikia wrote a letter to the then Assam Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal seeking urgent resolution of the issue and demanded legal land rights for the Mising community. Saika cited Citing how four schools in Laika were washed away by floods. He had also written to the National Human Rights Commission, alleging gross injustice to the Mising community.

On December 30, 2020, Sonowal constituted a 10-member committee. The committee submitted its proposal to the state on January 8, 2021, suggesting alternative sites for rehabilitation. The new proposal seeks to divert 135 hectares of forestland under Lakhimpur forest division for Dodhia residents, 166 hectares of Paharpur reserve forest and 72 hectares of land from Namphai forest reserve for Laika residents. The proposal has not found support from a large section of the Mising tribe.

Community members, along with the TMPK, have made their own list of favourable places for rehabilitation. They have also demanded that each family moving out of the national park should be given 0.67 hectares of land. 

In October 2023, residents of Paharpur protested the Assam Forest Department's move to rehabilitate Laika-Dodhia residents at in the area, fearing that they might lose their ancestral lands.

Minturaj Morang, chief convenor of the Laika-Dodhia rehabilitation demand committee, told LCW, "There has been no proper response/action by the government authorities when it comes to aiding/compensating and resettling the affected families." Morang also stated that indigenous families are living in miserable conditions.

The resettlement of 572 families of Laika residents is still under process. Out of the 572 families, 160 families were already allocated land in the Tapo area in Namphai, and the allocation of land process of 412 families in the Paharpur range is still under process by the government. For these 160 families, 72 hectares of land were allocated with 3 bighas (1 acre approx.) per family, and 109 families out of these, were earmarked for land allocation in the first phase. However, land entitlement has still not been given with papers by the authorities. The rest of the 51 families are under temporary rehabilitation in makeshift camps in the Tapo area.

For the 908 families of Dodhia, land allocation is still pending as the families had rejected their resettlement to Adhakona, Lakhimpur district~~ ~~_The communities _have demanded a flood-free area as they were devastated by floods in the past.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 2(b) [Critical wildlife habitat includes national parks and wildlife sanctuaries.] Section 4(2)(d) [Forest rights in critical wildlife areas can be modified or resettled. However, no FRA holders can be resettled unless certain conditions are met, including the competition of the recognition process of FRA claims.] Section 4(2)(f) [This provision mandates that no resettlement shall take place until facilities and land allocation at the resettlement location are complete as per the promised package] Section 4(5) [Forest-dwelling tribes may not be removed from occupied forestland before registration and verification process is complete]
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Section 18 [State Government may declare, by notification, an area with ecological significance as a wildlife sanctuary. The notification must specify the territorial limits of the sanctuary as nearly as possible] Section 19 [Collector must make an inquiry into the nature of rights of any persons in or over the land notified as a sanctuary under Section 18] Section 21 [When notification has been issued under Section 18, the Collector must publish a notice within 60 days to every town or village in the area. Affected persons can claim their rights in writing as mentioned in Section 19] Section 22 [Collector to expeditiously inquire into any claims made to them]
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 72 [State government may invest any forest office with the power to hold inquiry into forest offences]
Para 8.5.1 [In the aftermath of any major disaster, the state government should generate temporary livelihood options for affected communities.] Para 8.6.1 [In the case of devastating disasters, temporary shelters should be created for affected communities.]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Gauhati High Court

Case Number

WP(C)/353/2021, WP(C)/723/2016

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

A writ petition was filed by members of the affected community in 2016. While the Gauhati High Court has had hearings from time to time, no substantial order has been passed yet. On February 1, 2021, the High Court noted an affidavit submitted by the Deputy Commissioner of the Tinsukia district. This affidavit mentioned a rehabilitation proposal being formulated and forwarded to the forest department. Another writ petition was filed by forest villagers in 2021. The petitioners had been displaced due to the establishment of two wildlife sanctuaries in the Laika and Dadhia villages. From time to time, the court noted that the petitioners were staying in relief camps and that their living conditions had not improved yet. The last hearing for both cases however was held on May 27, 2022. There is no information regarding the next date of hearing.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Other harassment

Torching of houses

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

In 2013, authorities burnt down newly built huts of the Mising families who had settled in Namphai, calling them ‘encroachers’.

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

NA

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Environment and Forests, Government of Assam, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Lakhimpur Forest Division, Tinsukia Wildlife Division, Chief Wildlife Warden of Assam

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

N/A

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Takam Mising Porin Kebang (All Mising Students' Union), All Assam Students' Union, All India Tribal Students Association-Assam

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Indigenous Mising community members from Laika build houses in the government allocated area in Tapo, Namphai reserved forest, Digboi. | Credit: East Street Journal Asia

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Flood-affected Laika residents rebuild their homes in the Tapo area of the Namphai Reserved Forest in Digboi. | Credit: East Street Journal Asia

In the aftermath of the 1950 earthquake in Assam, thousands of families from the Mising tribe, living along the banks of the Brahmaputra, were displaced. The government of Assam established the Laika and Dodhia forest villages in Dibru and Saikhowa forests, respectively, between 1951 to 1957 to settle the Mising community. The Dibru and Saikhowa forest reserves were merged to form the Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary in 1986, and later_ _notified as a national park in 1999.

The rehabilitation of the residents of Laika-Dodhia villages has remained a contentious issue since. Successive state_ _governments have failed to rehabilitate the displaced families as they could not find suitable land. The affected families have been displaced multiple times due to recurrent floods and erosion.

The Takam Mising Porin Kebang (TMPK) alleges that Dibru-Saikhowa Wildlife Sanctuary was upgraded to a national park without consulting the forest dwellers living in the area.

According to a news report, the Mising families lack basic facilities, such as electricity and water supply, and have been denied access to government welfare schemes since 1986 even as a government notification mandated that the residents be permitted to reside in the forest area till they are shifted elsewhere.

In 2012, the Mising community was again displaced by floods from Laika-Dodhia. The community moved to Namphai forest reserve but were evicted by the forest department. In the years that followed, the Mising community has faced several evictions and harassment at the hands of forest officials. In 2013, the authorities burnt down newly built huts of the Mising families who had settled in Namphai, calling them ‘encroachers’.

Following another major flood in 2017, the Misings entered Tarani forest reserve. On July 21, 2017, a meeting was chaired by the deputy commissioner in Tinsukia with the district administration, forest department and TMPK representatives. It was decided that the state government “will take all necessary steps for the rehabilitation of the legal inhabitants of Dodhia forest village in Dibru Saikhowa National Park” within eight months.

On October 20, 2020, in a letter addressed to the Tinsukia Wildlife Division for the relocation of Laika and Dodhia residents, 373 hectares of land were proposed to be allocated in Owguri area of Upper Dehing Reserve Forest division. But during a detailed survey, it was found that rehabilitation would involve the felling of 8,000-10,000 trees. A committee constituted by the Tinsukia deputy commissioner had also objected to the rehabilitation of all people into a single area in Owguri.

About 3,000 Mising residents of Laika-Dodhia have been staging a protest since December 2020 at a makeshift site near the deputy commissioner’s office, which went on for more than 43 days. Three protesters, including a 24-year-old pregnant woman and another 50-year-old woman, died due to cold and lack of health facilities at the makeshift camp.

On December 29, 2020, Congress leader Debabrata Saikia wrote a letter to the then Assam Chief Minister Sarbananda Sonowal seeking urgent resolution of the issue and demanded legal land rights for the Mising community. Saika cited Citing how four schools in Laika were washed away by floods. He had also written to the National Human Rights Commission, alleging gross injustice to the Mising community.

On December 30, 2020, Sonowal constituted a 10-member committee. The committee submitted its proposal to the state on January 8, 2021, suggesting alternative sites for rehabilitation. The new proposal seeks to divert 135 hectares of forestland under Lakhimpur forest division for Dodhia residents, 166 hectares of Paharpur reserve forest and 72 hectares of land from Namphai forest reserve for Laika residents. The proposal has not found support from a large section of the Mising tribe.

Community members, along with the TMPK, have made their own list of favourable places for rehabilitation. They have also demanded that each family moving out of the national park should be given 0.67 hectares of land. 

In October 2023, residents of Paharpur protested the Assam Forest Department's move to rehabilitate Laika-Dodhia residents at in the area, fearing that they might lose their ancestral lands.

Minturaj Morang, chief convenor of the Laika-Dodhia rehabilitation demand committee, told LCW, "There has been no proper response/action by the government authorities when it comes to aiding/compensating and resettling the affected families." Morang also stated that indigenous families are living in miserable conditions.

The resettlement of 572 families of Laika residents is still under process. Out of the 572 families, 160 families were already allocated land in the Tapo area in Namphai, and the allocation of land process of 412 families in the Paharpur range is still under process by the government. For these 160 families, 72 hectares of land were allocated with 3 bighas (1 acre approx.) per family, and 109 families out of these, were earmarked for land allocation in the first phase. However, land entitlement has still not been given with papers by the authorities. The rest of the 51 families are under temporary rehabilitation in makeshift camps in the Tapo area.

For the 908 families of Dodhia, land allocation is still pending as the families had rejected their resettlement to Adhakona, Lakhimpur district~~ ~~_The communities _have demanded a flood-free area as they were devastated by floods in the past.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws

Legislations/Policies Involved

Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 2(b) [Critical wildlife habitat includes national parks and wildlife sanctuaries.] Section 4(2)(d) [Forest rights in critical wildlife areas can be modified or resettled. However, no FRA holders can be resettled unless certain conditions are met, including the competition of the recognition process of FRA claims.] Section 4(2)(f) [This provision mandates that no resettlement shall take place until facilities and land allocation at the resettlement location are complete as per the promised package] Section 4(5) [Forest-dwelling tribes may not be removed from occupied forestland before registration and verification process is complete]
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Section 18 [State Government may declare, by notification, an area with ecological significance as a wildlife sanctuary. The notification must specify the territorial limits of the sanctuary as nearly as possible] Section 19 [Collector must make an inquiry into the nature of rights of any persons in or over the land notified as a sanctuary under Section 18] Section 21 [When notification has been issued under Section 18, the Collector must publish a notice within 60 days to every town or village in the area. Affected persons can claim their rights in writing as mentioned in Section 19] Section 22 [Collector to expeditiously inquire into any claims made to them]
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 72 [State government may invest any forest office with the power to hold inquiry into forest offences]
Para 8.5.1 [In the aftermath of any major disaster, the state government should generate temporary livelihood options for affected communities.] Para 8.6.1 [In the case of devastating disasters, temporary shelters should be created for affected communities.]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-implementation/violation of FRA

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Lack of legal protection over land rights

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Gauhati High Court

Case Number

WP(C)/353/2021, WP(C)/723/2016

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

A writ petition was filed by members of the affected community in 2016. While the Gauhati High Court has had hearings from time to time, no substantial order has been passed yet. On February 1, 2021, the High Court noted an affidavit submitted by the Deputy Commissioner of the Tinsukia district. This affidavit mentioned a rehabilitation proposal being formulated and forwarded to the forest department. Another writ petition was filed by forest villagers in 2021. The petitioners had been displaced due to the establishment of two wildlife sanctuaries in the Laika and Dadhia villages. From time to time, the court noted that the petitioners were staying in relief camps and that their living conditions had not improved yet. The last hearing for both cases however was held on May 27, 2022. There is no information regarding the next date of hearing.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Other harassment

Torching of houses

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

In 2013, authorities burnt down newly built huts of the Mising families who had settled in Namphai, calling them ‘encroachers’.

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

NA

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Environment and Forests, Government of Assam, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Lakhimpur Forest Division, Tinsukia Wildlife Division, Chief Wildlife Warden of Assam

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

The researcher called the Office of the Deputy Commissioner to speak to Diganta Saikia, deputy commissioner of police. His PA answered the call and refused to comment on the issue over phone.

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Takam Mising Porin Kebang (All Mising Students' Union), All Assam Students' Union, All India Tribal Students Association-Assam

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:
Indigenous Mising community members from Laika build houses in the government allocated area in Tapo, Namphai reserved forest, Digboi. | Credit: East Street Journal Asia

Indigenous Mising community members from Laika build houses in the government allocated area in Tapo, Namphai reserved forest, Digboi. | Credit: East Street Journal Asia

Image Credit:  

Indigenous Mising community members from Laika build houses in the government allocated area in Tapo, Namphai reserved forest, Digboi. | Credit: East Street Journal Asia

Image Credit:  

Flood-affected Laika residents rebuild their homes in the Tapo area of the Namphai Reserved Forest in Digboi. | Credit: East Street Journal Asia

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch
cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now