JOIN THE LCW
COMMUNITY

Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, quarterly analytics report, curated expert talks, merchandise and much more. Support our work!

Sign up today

Farmers Agree to Revised Compensation for Their Land for Chandigarh-Baddi Rail line in Himachal

Reported by

Bimla Vishwapremi

Legal Review by

Edited by

Updated by

Published on

September 1, 2016

May 17, 2022

Edited on

September 1, 2016

State

Himachal Pradesh

Sector

Infrastructure

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

34

ha

Starting Year

2016

Location of Conflict

Saraj Majra, Shitalpur, Kalyanpur, Chak-Jangi, Landewal, Kenduwal, Billanwali Gujran, Haripur Sandholi and Sandholi villages

Solan

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Railways

Land Conflict Summary

The construction of the ChandigarhBaddi railway line had become a cause for unrest among farmers in Himachal Pradesh as the farmers did not agree to the compensation rate offered.  A threekilometre stretch of the 28 km railway line would be in Himachal Pradesh, and the remaining in Haryana. In the Solan district, farmlands from nine villages, measuring 33.75 hectares, was to be acquired in the Baddi industrial area. In 2016, the Northern Railway released its share of the fund, which initiated the land acquisition process, as per a news report. However, the farmers were demanding Rs 1 crore per bigha (0.16 ha) as compensation.  As per a news report, in July of the same year, the farmers were offered a rate of four times the prevailing circle rates for the land acquisition. The SubDivisional Magistrate of the Nalagarh division arrived at this decision in the negotiation committee he was chairing. He arrived at a figure of Rs 4.5 lakh to Rs 54 lakh as the price of the land. At the time, the SDM stated all villages except Kenuwaal had given consent, whose circle rates would revise after review. However, the affected farmers refused to accept the compensation offered.  In August 2019, the Principal Secretary (Transport) appointed SDM of Nalagarh as the component authority for the project. The project was also classified as a special railway project.  In October, the Ministry of Railways finally issued a notice for land acquisition for the project after a delay of four years. According to a news report, it gave the landowners 30 days to raise objections with the compensation with the competent authority.  As per another news report, the authorities set the target of April 2021 to compensate the affected farmers would receive compensation. The report stated that the competent authority was in the process of finalising the compensation rates for each village separately, after which the ministry would approve the decided awards. It was as per the prevailing circle rates and average rates, whichever was higher. In February, the Ministry of Railways released an amount of Rs. 100 crore for starting the project.  Subsequently, in April, the land acquisition process was completed in the nine villages, stated a news article

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

90

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

April 2021

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws, Central/State Government Policy, Other

Legislations/Policies Involved

Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA) Act, 2014
Section 53 (e) [A share of total area of reconstituted land to be re-allotted to landowner as specified by authority]; Section 56(1) [Land owners to be consulted by authority while making draft land pooling scheme]; Section 58 (3) [Authority to hand over reconstituted plots to land owners after formation of roads]; Section 99 [Right over original plot may be transferred to reconstituted plot in whole or in part if it is possible to do so, and if it is not, the right shall be extinguished provided that agricultural lease shall not be transferred without consent of all parties to the lease]; Section 124[Different means through which the Authority may acquire moveable or immovable property]; Section 125 [ The Authority may acquire land by mutual agreement through negotiated settlement]; Section 146 [Bar on legal proceedings for any act done under or in pursuance of the Act] 
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 41(9) [Alienation of land to be deemed null and void due to disregard of regulations]; Section 38 [Power of collector to take possession of acquired land after full payment of compensation within 3 months, and completion of resettlement and rehabilitation]
Andhra Pradesh Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Rules, 2014
Rule 34 [Return of Land to the Original Land Owner if land remains unused for 5 years after possession being taken]
Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977
Section 3 [Lands assigned to assignees cannot be further transferred]
Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Repeal Act, 2020
Section 2 [Repeal of the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act, 2014]
Andhra Pradesh Decentralisation and Inclusive Development of All Regions Act, 2020
Section 5 & 6 [Powers and functions of the Zonal planning and development Board to review, implement, and supervise the development & project plans of the particular zone]
Andhra Pradesh Capital City Land Pooling Scheme (Formulation and Implementation) Rules, 2015
Rule 5 (2) [The authority guarantees the return of reconstituted land and the payment of other benefits as stipulated to the land owners]
Constitution of India, 1950
Article14 [Right to equality before law]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

No items found.

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Northern Railways Authority - Ministry of Railways, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Revenue Department of Himachal Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

The construction of the ChandigarhBaddi railway line had become a cause for unrest among farmers in Himachal Pradesh as the farmers did not agree to the compensation rate offered.  A threekilometre stretch of the 28 km railway line would be in Himachal Pradesh, and the remaining in Haryana. In the Solan district, farmlands from nine villages, measuring 33.75 hectares, was to be acquired in the Baddi industrial area. In 2016, the Northern Railway released its share of the fund, which initiated the land acquisition process, as per a news report. However, the farmers were demanding Rs 1 crore per bigha (0.16 ha) as compensation.  As per a news report, in July of the same year, the farmers were offered a rate of four times the prevailing circle rates for the land acquisition. The SubDivisional Magistrate of the Nalagarh division arrived at this decision in the negotiation committee he was chairing. He arrived at a figure of Rs 4.5 lakh to Rs 54 lakh as the price of the land. At the time, the SDM stated all villages except Kenuwaal had given consent, whose circle rates would revise after review. However, the affected farmers refused to accept the compensation offered.  In August 2019, the Principal Secretary (Transport) appointed SDM of Nalagarh as the component authority for the project. The project was also classified as a special railway project.  In October, the Ministry of Railways finally issued a notice for land acquisition for the project after a delay of four years. According to a news report, it gave the landowners 30 days to raise objections with the compensation with the competent authority.  As per another news report, the authorities set the target of April 2021 to compensate the affected farmers would receive compensation. The report stated that the competent authority was in the process of finalising the compensation rates for each village separately, after which the ministry would approve the decided awards. It was as per the prevailing circle rates and average rates, whichever was higher. In February, the Ministry of Railways released an amount of Rs. 100 crore for starting the project.  Subsequently, in April, the land acquisition process was completed in the nine villages, stated a news article

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

Total investment involved (in Crores):

90

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

April 2021

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Land Acquisition Laws, Central/State Government Policy, Other

Legislations/Policies Involved

Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority (APCRDA) Act, 2014
Section 53 (e) [A share of total area of reconstituted land to be re-allotted to landowner as specified by authority]; Section 56(1) [Land owners to be consulted by authority while making draft land pooling scheme]; Section 58 (3) [Authority to hand over reconstituted plots to land owners after formation of roads]; Section 99 [Right over original plot may be transferred to reconstituted plot in whole or in part if it is possible to do so, and if it is not, the right shall be extinguished provided that agricultural lease shall not be transferred without consent of all parties to the lease]; Section 124[Different means through which the Authority may acquire moveable or immovable property]; Section 125 [ The Authority may acquire land by mutual agreement through negotiated settlement]; Section 146 [Bar on legal proceedings for any act done under or in pursuance of the Act] 
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 41(9) [Alienation of land to be deemed null and void due to disregard of regulations]; Section 38 [Power of collector to take possession of acquired land after full payment of compensation within 3 months, and completion of resettlement and rehabilitation]
Andhra Pradesh Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Rules, 2014
Rule 34 [Return of Land to the Original Land Owner if land remains unused for 5 years after possession being taken]
Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977
Section 3 [Lands assigned to assignees cannot be further transferred]
Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Repeal Act, 2020
Section 2 [Repeal of the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act, 2014]
Andhra Pradesh Decentralisation and Inclusive Development of All Regions Act, 2020
Section 5 & 6 [Powers and functions of the Zonal planning and development Board to review, implement, and supervise the development & project plans of the particular zone]
Andhra Pradesh Capital City Land Pooling Scheme (Formulation and Implementation) Rules, 2015
Rule 5 (2) [The authority guarantees the return of reconstituted land and the payment of other benefits as stipulated to the land owners]
Constitution of India, 1950
Article14 [Right to equality before law]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

No items found.

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Protests/marches

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Northern Railways Authority - Ministry of Railways, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Revenue Department of Himachal Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Himachal Pradesh

cross
Not a member yet?
Sign up now